Abstract
The Himalayas, also known as the crown of India, are one of the most ecologically sensitive areas of the world. This resource-rich and unstable area has long been subject to competing pressures of conservation and development. In recent decades, the construction of hydropower projects, highways, and the enhancement of tourism infrastructure in the Himalayan states like Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, and Sikkim have raised a fundamental legal question: Can such development be permitted in ecologically vulnerable zones at the expense of long-term environmental stability? According to the Indian jurisprudence, the clear answer to this question is no; such activities that hamper the balance of the environment are prohibited in such ecologically sensitive areas. The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra (RLEK) v. State of Uttar Pradesh, famously declared that "ecology is a permanent economy." This three-decade-old principle, given by the Supreme Court, still remains profoundly relevant even today as the Himalayas continue to bear the brunt of unchecked development, which is inherently causing damage to the ecology.