Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management

Advancing Law and Management

ISSN No. : 2583-9896

Decoupling Women’s Reservation from Delimitation: Exploring Constitutional Pathways for Immediate Implementation in India

📄 Download Full PDF

Cite this Article

Nikita Singh (2026). Decoupling Women’s Reservation from Delimitation: Exploring Constitutional Pathways for Immediate Implementation in India. The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management, Volume III(Issue 9). Retrieved from https://ijrlm.com/journal/decoupling-womens-reservation-from-delimitation-exploring-constitutional-pathways-for-immediate-implementation-in-india/

Abstract

Women's political representation in India remains at a critical crisis point. Despite constituting 48% of the country's population, women occupy only 15% of Lok Sabha seats (80 out of 543 MPs). The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act 2023 passed unanimously in Parliament, reserving 33% of seats for women. However, Article 334A delays implementation until "after delimitation after the first census taken after commencement," effectively postponing women's reservation until 2029 elections. This paper argues that women's reservation is being held hostage by federalism concerns. Article 334A uses ambiguous language ("a delimitation exercise" ≠ "the census-based delimitation"), creating constitutional space for decoupling. Parliament can amend Articles 82 and 334A to allow immediate implementation using 2011 Census data. Federalism should not delay women's fundamental right to representation. The federalism controversy stems from the North-South divide. Northern states (Bihar, UP, Rajasthan, MP) have high population growth and will gain 40-50 Lok Sabha seats if delimitation uses 2011 Census. Southern states (Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka) controlled population through education and family planning, and will lose 25-30 seats. The government argues waiting for 2027 Census ensures fair representation. Opposition argues women's rights should not be held hostage by federal balance. This paper examines: (1) constitutional framework, (2) federalism controversy, (3) comparative country models (Rwanda 61%, France 47%, Sweden 47%, Nepal 33%), (4) judicial precedents showing no Supreme Court ruling blocks decoupling, and (5) constitutional pathways for decoupling through amending Articles 82 and 334A. The paper concludes that decoupling is constitutionally viable and morally necessary. Parliament should amend Article 334A to remove "after census," protect southern states' seats through proportional expansion, and use 2011 Census for immediate delimitation. Women deserve representation in 2029, not 2031. 33 years of delay (1989-2029) is unacceptable. Decoupling is morally necessary.

Journal Information

The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management
ISSN No.
2583-9896
Submit Manuscript
Licensing
All research articles published in The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management are fully open-access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download, and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJRLM or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJRLM.

Article Analytics

21
Page Views
3
Downloads