Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management

Advancing Law and Management

ISSN No. : 2583-9896

One Doctrine of Unconscionability in Contract: A Legal Analysis

Cite this Article

Himanshu Sharma (2026). One Doctrine of Unconscionability in Contract: A Legal Analysis. The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management, Volume III(Issue 9). Retrieved from https://ijrlm.com/journal/one-doctrine-of-unconscionability-in-contract-a-legal-analysis/

Abstract

The doctrine of unconscionability has emerged as a significant equitable principle within contract law, enabling courts to invalidate or refuse enforcement of agreements that are fundamentally unjust, oppressive, or exploitative. Rooted in English equitable jurisprudence and subsequently incorporated into Indian contract law through judicial interpretation, the doctrine seeks to preserve contractual fairness by protecting parties subjected to unequal bargaining power, coercion, undue influence, or deceptive practices. This article examines the historical evolution and conceptual foundations of the doctrine, tracing its development from English common law to its contemporary application within the Indian legal framework. It critically analyses the statutory provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, particularly those relating to coercion, undue influence, free consent, and unlawful consideration, alongside landmark judicial decisions that have expanded the doctrine's scope. The article further explores the essential elements of unconscionable contracts, including unequal bargaining power, absence of free consent, unfair contractual terms, and fraudulent inducement, while distinguishing between procedural and substantive unconscionability. It also evaluates the recommendations of the Law Commission of India concerning judicial intervention in unfair contractual arrangements. The study adopts a doctrinal research methodology based on statutory interpretation, judicial precedents, and scholarly literature. It concludes that although the Indian Contract Act does not expressly codify the doctrine of unconscionability, judicial innovation has effectively incorporated equitable principles to ensure that contractual freedom does not become an instrument of exploitation. The doctrine thus serves as a vital mechanism for balancing the principle of pacta sunt servanda with the constitutional values of equity, justice, and fairness in contractual relationships.

Journal Information

The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management
ISSN No.
2583-9896
Submit Manuscript
Licensing
All research articles published in The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management are fully open-access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download, and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJRLM or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJRLM.

Article Analytics

11
Page Views
0
Downloads