Abstract
The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act,
2006, informally called the Forest Rights Act (FRA), represents a significant structural break
with Indian environmental, human rights and constitutional property regimes. For over a century,
colonial laws severed organic links between tribal and other forest-dwelling communities and
their traditional forested ecosystems, characterising them as encroachers and unlawful holders of
state property. By providing for the formal recognition, recordation, and vesting of Individual
Forest Rights and Collective Forest Rights over community and individual forest lands that
historically were ancestral lands of these populations, the landmark FRA seeks to rectify a long
and multifold historical injustice. This qualitative socio-legal study analyses the implementation
framework of the FRA by addressing its dual constitutional objectives of structural community
empowerment and decentralised ecological conservation. Through a combination of qualitative
analysis of the provisions of the FRA and empirical information on ground-level implementation
reports from across India, this paper identifies the major systemic, institutional, and operational
constraints that continue to undermine the law’s transformative potential. These include severe
bureaucratic resistance within the forest department, structural impediments and evidential
challenges for non-tribal traditional forest dwellers in making claims, and the conflict of the FRA
with corporate resource extraction interests and other major environmental laws. Ultimately, the
article offers an integrated set of legal, institutional and operational recommendations to bridge
the gap between its progressive text and flawed implementation so as to achieve for India’s
forest dwellers both socio-legal justice and substantive self-governance over their traditional
environments and livelihoods.