Abstract
This article provides an in-depth analysis of contract labour regulations, focusing primarily on the historical evolution, statutory frameworks, and judicial complexities within the Indian legal system. Contract labour presents a perpetual jurisprudential challenge: balancing capital's demand for economic flexibility and operational efficiency with the constitutional mandate to protect marginalized workers from systemic exploitation. The paper traces this trajectory from unregulated pre-independence practices to the watershed enactment of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA Act). It critically examines the CLRA Act’s dual mechanism prohibiting contract labour in core, perennial activities while establishing strict regulatory mandates for welfare amenities, licensing, and wage security in permitted sectors.
Furthermore, the article explores the dynamic role of the Indian judiciary, highlighting the landmark SAIL judgment and the evolution of judicial tests used to pierce the veil of "sham" contracts to secure worker regularization. The analysis then evaluates the impending paradigm shift introduced by the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (OSH Code). While the OSH Code aims to consolidate existing laws and promote the ease of doing business, the paper argues that its increased applicability thresholds and broad exceptions for "non-core" activities risk eroding essential protections for a vast segment of the unorganized workforce. Finally, the article contextualizes these national developments within the broader global challenge of the digital gig economy, where algorithm-driven platform work mirrors historical contract vulnerabilities and demands innovative regulatory interventions.