Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management

Advancing Law and Management

ISSN No. : 2583-9896

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements of India

Cite this Article

Jayashree Raman (2026). Landmark Supreme Court Judgements of India. The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management, Volume IV(Issue 1). Retrieved from https://ijrlm.com/journal/landmark-supreme-court-judgements-of-india/

Abstract

The Supreme Court of India plays a vital role in protecting the Constitution and upholding the principles of justice, liberty, equality, and democracy. Its landmark judgements have significantly influenced the development of Indian law and the interpretation of constitutional provisions. These judgements address important issues relating to Fundamental Rights, gender equality, personal liberty, social justice, and the rule of law. Decisions such as Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, and Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India have shaped the constitutional framework of the country. This blog explores some of the most significant Supreme Court judgements in India, their legal principles, and their impact on Indian society. Ultimately, these landmark decisions demonstrate the judiciary's responsibility in preserving constitutional values and strengthening the foundations of Indian democracy.

Journal Information

The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management
ISSN No.
2583-9896
Submit Manuscript
Licensing
All research articles published in The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management are fully open-access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download, and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJRLM or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJRLM.

Article Analytics

7
Page Views
0
Downloads