Abstract
The development of social media has led to a change in the way people interact, express themselves, and engage in public debate. Facebook, X (previously known as Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and WhatsApp are some of the mediums that can be used to share ideas and opinions and encourage participation in the democratic process. Though the development of these social media tools has improved the constitutional protection of the right to freedom of speech and expression, it has made the dissemination of hate speech, misinformation, cyberbullying, and calls to violence much faster.
In India, the right to freedom of speech and expression is guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, but is subject to reasonable restrictions as per Article 19(2). The judiciary has always maintained that democracy functions on the basis of free exchange of ideas, but acknowledged that the right to speech can be reasonably curtailed in case of any speech that incites violence, disrupts public order or expresses feelings of hatred. The emergence of social media has further increased the dilemma for the constitutional law of India in trying to strike a balance between individual rights and collective interest. Laws like Information Technology Act, 2000, Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 aim to counter hate speech and other illegal content on social media platforms.
The present paper aims to address the link between freedom of speech and hate speech in the realm of social media, especially in relation to the legal system of India. It focuses on analyzing constitutional and statutory provisions, judicial rulings, and international trends in terms of regulation of social media usage. In addition, the paper explores the obligations of social media intermediaries as well as the issues that arise in conjunction with the use of artificial intelligence in content moderation.