Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management

Advancing Law and Management

ISSN No. : 2583-9896

JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY V. UNION OF INDIA (2017): EVOLUTION OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA

Cite this Article

Aradhya Singh (2026). JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY V. UNION OF INDIA (2017): EVOLUTION OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA. The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management, Volume III(Issue 9). Retrieved from https://ijrlm.com/journal/justice-k-s-puttaswamy-v-union-of-india-2017-evolution-of-the-right-to-privacy-in-india/

Abstract

The 2017 landmark judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India marks a historic constitutional renaissance in Indian jurisprudence. Triggered by a retired judge’s challenge to the biometric Aadhaar project, the Union of India argued that privacy was not a guaranteed fundamental right, relying on antiquated post-independence precedents. Overturning decades of state-centric rulings, a unanimous nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court declared the Right to Privacy an intrinsic part of the Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21. The court recognized privacy as an inalienable, natural right essential for human dignity and autonomy, classifying it into spatial, informational, and bodily dimensions. This case comment critically analyzes the evolution of privacy jurisprudence in India. It examines the court’s legal reasoning, evaluates the structural "proportionality test" established to counter state overreach, and assesses the judgment's enduring impact on digital data protection and individual liberty.

Journal Information

The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management
ISSN No.
2583-9896
Submit Manuscript
Licensing
All research articles published in The Indian Journal for Research in Law and Management are fully open-access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download, and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJRLM or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJRLM.

Article Analytics

7
Page Views
1
Downloads