Abstract
Economists have explored the issue of people not following tax rules — especially tax evasion — quite thoroughly in their research over the years. Lawyers generally do not pay much attention to irregularities in the fiscal system. One notable exception is tax avoidance, which often draws interest because it is typically seen as a matter of legal form versus actual substance. Tax avoidance is analysed as the strategic arrangement of financial affairs to minimise tax liability within the parameters of statutory law, whereas tax evasion is identified as the deliberate concealment or misrepresentation of information to unlawfully reduce tax obligations. In India, the distinction between these two practices has significant legal implications. This article set forth the statutory frameworks governing both phenomena, with particular emphasis on the operation of general and specific anti-avoidance rules [GAAR and SAAR] and the criminal sanctions applicable to acts constituting tax evasion in India. The purpose of this article is to explore judicial interpretations which plays an important role in demarcating the line between lawful tax planning and unlawful tax evasion. The article also delves into the wider social and political impacts of tax evasion and avoidance, particularly how they weaken public finances and compromise the principle of fiscal fairness. The article concludes by emphasizing on the urgent need for well - defined legal provisions and effective enforcement tools to uphold the credibility of the Indian tax system and to discourage both unlawful tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance practices in India.