Monopoly And Anti Competition In Film Distribution: Legal Implications Of Multiplex Chains Favouring Big Studios

This paper examines how film distribution in India has gradually become skewed in favor of big studios, particularly following the expansion of multiplex chains. What started as a limited-distributor market has slowly turned into a system where small and regional filmmakers are being pushed out not through direct bans, but through practices that favour the powerful. Booking of halls, extended and premium show slots, and festival-time releases are mostly reserved for high-budget films, leaving smaller films with little room to breathe. These issues raise concerns not only under the Competition Act (Sections 3 and 4) but also under constitutional protections, such as Articles 14, 15, 21, and 301. The research asks: To what extent does the current Indian legal framework actually protect fair competition in film distribution, and what needs to change to make it better and more inclusive? The reforms suggested are simple but necessary. Multiplexes need to be more transparent about how they pick films and share profits. No single chain should dominate a whole region. Even reserving a small number of screens for independent or regional cinema could make a big difference. And there has to be a faster way to settle disputes, because by the time decisions are made, the film’s chance has often already passed. With no clear law covering many of these unfair practices, change is long overdue. Keywords- Film Distribution, Anti-Competitive Practices, Multiplex Monopoly, Cultural Diversity, Competition Law in India