PASSIVE EUTHNASIA AND RIGHT TO DIE

Passive euthanasia has remained one of the most debated issues in medical jurisprudence, involving a delicate balance between the right to life, personal autonomy, and medical ethics. This case commentary critically examines the landmark judgment of Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India (2018), in which the Supreme Court of India recognized the legality of passive euthanasia and upheld the validity of advance medical directives (living wills) under specific safeguards. The commentary analyses the constitutional interpretation of Article 21, emphasizing the Court's recognition of the right to die with dignity as an integral part of the right to life. It further explores the legal principles, procedural safeguards, and ethical concerns surrounding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. By evaluating the significance of the judgment and its impact on end-of-life care in India, the commentary highlights the evolving approach of Indian constitutional jurisprudence towards individual dignity, autonomy, and compassionate healthcare.