Abstract
The Basic Structure of a Constitution refers to the set of fundamental values and principles that underpin its philosophy and the institutional arrangements that constitute its core identity and purpose. Any abrogation or substantial alteration of these elements risks undermining the very foundation of the constitutional order. It reflects the philosophy of Constitutionalism, asserting that certain values are intrinsic to the legitimacy of the constitutional order. These values are mutable within the immutable framework as they are to remain protected even as other aspects of the Constitution evolve to respond to social, political, or technological change. However, judicial interpretation and constitutional debates have expanded and refined the scope of what constitutes the ‘basic’ over time. This article examines the discourse surrounding the Basic Structure Doctrine in the context of the Indian Constitution, considering both historical and contemporary political developments. It highlights critical questions regarding how to define the boundaries of the Doctrine’s expansion while attempting to incorporate new societal values, and what methodology courts should employ to decide whether a value is basic? Whether it should be guided by historical intent, structural necessity, or functional indispensability?