Abstract
For decades, purchasing a home in India resembled an act of faith more than a legally protected transaction shaped by delay, opacity, and asymmetric bargaining power between promoters and buyers. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) marked a decisive regulatory intervention designed to recalibrate this imbalance through transparency mandates, financial discipline, specialised adjudicatory mechanisms, and strengthened consumer rights. This paper critically examines the structural failures of the pre-RERA regime, the statutory architecture and institutional design of the Act, and its operational interface with property, insolvency, and consumer protection laws. It further evaluates the measurable regulatory impact of RERA in reducing project delays, enhancing disclosure standards, improving dispute resolution, and restoring market confidence, while simultaneously exposing persistent implementation deficits such as fragmented state enforcement, regulatory evasion through shell entities and statutory exemptions, and digital accessibility constraints affecting buyers. The study argues that RERA represents not merely sectoral regulation but a paradigmatic shift toward rights based housing governance in India. Nevertheless, the durability of this transformation depends upon sustained institutional capacity, coherent nationwide enforcement, and adaptive regulatory reform capable of converting homeownership from speculative vulnerability into enforceable legal security within India’s evolving urban economy.