Abstract
The Internet has transformed the way businesses interact with customers. With businesses going online, domain names started to act as virtual office fronts. A domain name is actually a web address. But, in reality, individuals often recognise a business by the domain name as well as by the trademark. This put a new twist on the legal issue: what if someone used a domain name that was nearly the same as an established brand?
One of India's earliest and important cases relating to this question was Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora. India did not have specific legislation to deal with domain-name disputes at the time. Thus, the Delhi High Court resorted to the old concept of ‘passing off’ and applied this concept to the internet. The idea was simple: if a domain name could identify a business and influence consumers, it should be protected against deceptive imitation.
The decision is important not only for Yahoo!'s business interests, but also for protecting users from being misled. Most significantly, it demonstrated the adaptability of an old legal principle to a new technological issue.